↓ Skip to main content

In-silico designing of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates and their anti-HIV potential

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-silico designing of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates and their anti-HIV potential
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-s1-p3
Authors

Dipti Yadav, Anuradha Singh, Madhu Yadav, Ramendra K Singh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,359,860
of 5,041,086 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,737
of 2,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,208
of 78,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#62
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,041,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.