↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lachlan F Miles, Edward Litton, Georgina Imberger, David Story

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Other 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,380,460
of 14,619,289 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,983
of 11,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,611
of 322,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,619,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.