↓ Skip to main content

Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tenzin Wangmo, Mirjam Lipps, Reto W. Kressig, Marcello Ienca

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Unspecified 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Computer Science 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,704,681
of 14,619,289 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#294
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,737
of 322,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#53
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,619,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.