↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia M Maceira, Raad H Mohiaddin

Abstract

Systemic hypertension is a highly prevalent potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of underlying causes for hypertension, in assessing cardiovascular complications of hypertension, and in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease process. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides accurate and reproducible measures of ventricular volumes, mass, function and haemodynamics as well as uniquely allowing tissue characterization of diffuse and focal fibrosis. In addition, CMR is well suited for exclusion of common secondary causes for hypertension. We review the current and emerging clinical and research applications of CMR in hypertension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Other 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,839,069
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,056
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,129
of 181,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.