You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Maternal Penning to Improve Calf Survival in the Chisana Caribou Herd
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Monographs, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wmon.1044 |
| Authors |
Layne G. Adams, Richard Farnell, Michelle P. Oakley, Thomas S. Jung, Lorne L. Larocque, Grant M. Lortie, Jamie Mclelland, Mason E. Reid, Gretchen H. Roffler, Don E. Russell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,854,217
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Monographs
#15
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,738
of 340,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Monographs
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them