↓ Skip to main content

Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001174.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Pantoja, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Nathalie Colomer, Carla Castañon, Javiera Leniz Martelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,382,867
of 14,539,453 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,869
of 10,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,033
of 318,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,539,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.