You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic considerations support C-reactive protein testing alongside malaria rapid diagnostic tests to guide antimicrobial therapy for patients with febrile illness in settings with low malaria endemicity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-3059-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoel Lubell, Arjun Chandna, Frank Smithuis, Lisa White, Heiman F. L. Wertheim, Maël Redard-Jacot, Zachary Katz, Arjen Dondorp, Nicholas Day, Nicholas White, Sabine Dittrich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
Brazil | 1 | 7% |
Thailand | 1 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 7% |
Cameroon | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,460,987
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,009
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,885
of 480,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#30
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.