↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: Innate Immune Activation by Inhaled Lipopolysaccharide, Independent of Oxidative Stress, Exacerbates Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: Innate Immune Activation by Inhaled Lipopolysaccharide, Independent of Oxidative Stress, Exacerbates Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice
Published in
PLoS ONE, May 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0155388
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Brass, Jennifer C. Spencer, Zhuowei Li, Erin Potts-Kant, Sarah M. Reilly, Mary K. Dunkel, Joseph D. Latoche, Richard L. Auten, John W. Hollingsworth, Cheryl L. Fattman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Design 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#9,117,394
of 11,884,958 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#90,914
of 130,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,034
of 276,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#3,512
of 4,794 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,884,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,794 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.