↓ Skip to main content

A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google EarthTM imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google EarthTM imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

LP Galway, Nathaniel Bell, Al Shatari SAE, Amy Hagopian, Gilbert Burnham, Abraham Flaxman, Wiliam M Weiss, Julie Rajaratnam, Tim K Takaro

Abstract

Mortality estimates can measure and monitor the impacts of conflict on a population, guide humanitarian efforts, and help to better understand the public health impacts of conflict. Vital statistics registration and surveillance systems are rarely functional in conflict settings, posing a challenge of estimating mortality using retrospective population-based surveys.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 181 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 15%
Environmental Science 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 6%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,304,862
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#74
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,737
of 175,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.