↓ Skip to main content

The OMACS-PIL study: a randomised controlled trial within the OMACS observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The OMACS-PIL study: a randomised controlled trial within the OMACS observational study
Published in
Trials, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3958-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Culliford, Rachel Brierley, Madeleine Clout, Rebecca Evans, Rachel Maishman, Dawn Phillips, Hana Tabusa, Barney Reeves, Chris A. Rogers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#11,735,102
of 15,380,940 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,095
of 4,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,747
of 342,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#414
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,380,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.