↓ Skip to main content

Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Breast Cancer Survivorship: Where Are We Today?
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Special Issues in Younger Women with Breast Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Special Issues in Older Women with Breast Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Breast Cancer Among Special Populations: Disparities in Care Across the Cancer Control Continuum
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Symptoms: Fatigue and Cognitive Dysfunction
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Symptoms: Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Symptoms: Aromatase Inhibitor Induced Arthralgias
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Symptoms: Lymphedema
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Symptoms: Menopause, Infertility, and Sexual Health
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Host Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence: Genetic, Epigenetic and Biologic Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Comorbidities and Their Management: Potential Impact on Breast Cancer Outcomes
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Current Controversies and Research Recommendations.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Risk Reduction from Weight Management and Physical Activity Interventions
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Quality of Care, Including Survivorship Care Plans.
Attention for Chapter 14: Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Improving Outcomes for Breast Cancer Survivors
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-916365-9, 978-3-31-916366-6
Authors

Fabian, Carol, Carol Fabian

Abstract

As recurrence free survival following a breast cancer diagnosis continues to improve, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality will assume greater importance in the breast cancer survivorship research agenda particularly for women receiving potentially cardiotoxic therapy. Development of (1) tools to readily identify pre-diagnostic risk factors for cardiac dysfunction, (2) well-tolerated prophylactic treatments to reduce the risk of cardiac injury, and (3) sensitive and affordable monitoring techniques which can identify subclinical toxicity prior to a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction are or should be focus areas of cardio-oncology research. Since weight as well as cardiorespiratory fitness generally decline after a breast cancer diagnosis, behavioral approaches which can improve energy balance and fitness are important to optimize cardiovascular health in all breast cancer survivors not just those undergoing cardiotoxic therapy. These goals are likely best achieved by partnerships between cardiologists, oncologists and internists such as those initiated with the formation of the International CardiOncology Society (ICOS) and the NCI Community Cardiotoxicity Task Force.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Psychology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,281,556
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,902
of 5,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,017
of 364,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#79
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.