↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of tool use in a seabird

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
1962 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of tool use in a seabird
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1918060117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette L. Fayet, Erpur Snær Hansen, Dora Biro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,962 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Psychology 7 11%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,508
of 16,294,222 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#157
of 87,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221
of 374,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,294,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.