You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Comparative Metabolic Network Flux Analysis to Identify Differences in Cellular Metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Metabolic Flux Analysis in Eukaryotic Cells
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0159-4_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160158-7, 978-1-07-160159-4
|
| Authors |
Sarah McGarrity, Sigurður T. Karvelsson, Ólafur E. Sigurjónsson, Óttar Rolfsson, McGarrity, Sarah, Karvelsson, Sigurður T., Sigurjónsson, Ólafur E., Rolfsson, Óttar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,597,497
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#10,049
of 13,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381,883
of 457,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#94
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.