You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathways to catastrophic health expenditure for acute coronary syndrome in Kerala: ‘Good health at low cost’?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meena Daivadanam |
| Abstract |
Universal health coverage through the removal of financial and other barriers to access, particularly for people who are poor, is a global priority. This viewpoint describes the many pathways to catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) for patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) based on two case studies and the thematic analysis of field notes regarding 210 patients and their households from a study based in Kerala, India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,225,719
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,679
of 15,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,801
of 165,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#42
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.