↓ Skip to main content

The Golden Section as Optical Limitation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Elliott, Joy Kelly, Jonas Friedel, Jennifer Brodsky, Paul Mulcahy

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 21%
Arts and Humanities 3 13%
Neuroscience 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Design 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,279,241
of 16,535,380 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,924
of 160,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,158
of 382,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#66
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,535,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.