↓ Skip to main content

The Golden Section as Optical Limitation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Golden Section as Optical Limitation
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Elliott, Joy Kelly, Jonas Friedel, Jennifer Brodsky, Paul Mulcahy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 16%
Neuroscience 5 16%
Arts and Humanities 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Design 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,344,644
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,021
of 198,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,575
of 263,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,328
of 6,572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.