↓ Skip to main content

A construção do processo de trabalho no Núcleo de Apoio à Saúde da Família: a experiência dos farmacêuticos em um município do sul do Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A construção do processo de trabalho no Núcleo de Apoio à Saúde da Família: a experiência dos farmacêuticos em um município do sul do Brasil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015215.17412014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina Akemi Nakamura, Silvana Nair Leite

Abstract

The Family Health Support Nucleus (NASF) was created in 2008 with the objective of broadening the range and scope of primary healthcare. The insertion of pharmacists in this multi-professional context represents an opportunity to enhance the working process and the rational access and use of medicines. The working processes of pharmacists in a city NASF was investigated. Field research was conducted using a qualitative approach with participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Two analytic dialectic categories emerged. The first was the pharmacists' dilemma in the construction of their working process as promoters of primary healthcare, while at the same time facing the need to deal with managerial functions mostly to cater to operational demand. The second was the reality experienced with guidelines and coordination of their work, where pharmacists can be free to structure their work as supporters, although at the same time it limits them due to lack of acknowledgment of their previously established working process. The lack of planning and a clear objective for work in the NASF, besides the deficiency of pharmaceutical services in primary healthcare make the development of any type of pharmacist activity important and essential even if it does not fully attend the NASF proposal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 20%