↓ Skip to main content

What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Kögel, Ralf J. Jox, Orsolya Friedrich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,680,417
of 15,124,181 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#199
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,290
of 332,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#35
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.