↓ Skip to main content

Reducing discards of demersal species using a 100 mm square mesh cylinder: Size selectivity and catch comparison analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Policy, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Reducing discards of demersal species using a 100 mm square mesh cylinder: Size selectivity and catch comparison analysis
Published in
Marine Policy, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103777
Authors

Paul Gatti, Sonia Méhault, Fabien Morandeau, Marie Morfin, Marianne Robert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#11,737,053
of 15,383,358 outputs
Outputs from Marine Policy
#1,942
of 2,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,305
of 341,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Policy
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,383,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.