↓ Skip to main content

Connecting With Patients—The Missing Links

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
124 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
Title
Connecting With Patients—The Missing Links
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.20153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Sanders, Auguste H. Fortin, Gordon D. Schiff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#226,784
of 14,158,663 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,448
of 26,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,081
of 223,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#85
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,158,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.