↓ Skip to main content

Connecting With Patients—The Missing Links

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
131 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
Title
Connecting With Patients—The Missing Links
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.20153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Sanders, Auguste H. Fortin, Gordon D. Schiff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#228,035
of 14,546,547 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,489
of 26,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,927
of 318,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#122
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.