You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Connecting With Patients—The Missing Links
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.20153 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisa Sanders, Auguste H. Fortin, Gordon D. Schiff |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 35 | 27% |
United States | 31 | 24% |
Canada | 4 | 3% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 42 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 90 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 19% |
Scientists | 13 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 5 | 22% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#443,151
of 24,076,257 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,041
of 34,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,095
of 463,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#134
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,076,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.