You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is useful research? The good, the bad, and the stable
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-019-0556-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M. Ozonoff, Philippe Grandjean |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,183,374
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#1,023
of 1,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,459
of 456,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.