↓ Skip to main content

Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
482 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
959 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12929-019-0609-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Kai Huang, Shu-Ping Chao, Chaur-Jong Hu

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) accounts for 60-70% of dementia cases. Given the seriousness of the disease and continual increase in patient numbers, developing effective therapies to treat AD has become urgent. Presently, the drugs available for AD treatment, including cholinesterase inhibitors and an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, can only inhibit dementia symptoms for a limited period of time but cannot stop or reverse disease progression. On the basis of the amyloid hypothesis, many global drug companies have conducted many clinical trials on amyloid clearing therapy but without success. Thus, the amyloid hypothesis may not be completely feasible. The number of anti-amyloid trials decreased in 2019, which might be a turning point. An in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the contribution of amyloid beta and other factors of AD is crucial for developing novel pharmacotherapies.In ongoing clinical trials, researchers have developed and are testing several possible interventions aimed at various targets, including anti-amyloid and anti-tau interventions, neurotransmitter modification, anti-neuroinflammation and neuroprotection interventions, and cognitive enhancement, and interventions to relieve behavioral psychological symptoms. In this article, we present the current state of clinical trials for AD at clinicaltrials.gov. We reviewed the underlying mechanisms of these trials, tried to understand the reason why prior clinical trials failed, and analyzed the future trend of AD clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 959 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 959 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 159 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 11%
Student > Master 97 10%
Researcher 78 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 4%
Other 83 9%
Unknown 400 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 11%
Neuroscience 91 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 88 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 6%
Chemistry 44 5%
Other 138 14%
Unknown 435 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 281. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#126,100
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#6
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,902
of 473,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.