↓ Skip to main content

Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1264-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maya B. Mathur, Thomas N. Robinson, David B. Reichling, Christopher D. Gardner, Janice Nadler, Paul A. Bain, Jacob Peacock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 11 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,561,397
of 16,566,910 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#317
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,460
of 383,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#56
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,566,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.