↓ Skip to main content

Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1264-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maya B. Mathur, Thomas N. Robinson, David B. Reichling, Christopher D. Gardner, Janice Nadler, Paul A. Bain, Jacob Peacock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 12 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,953,283
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#397
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,346
of 392,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#71
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.