↓ Skip to main content

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007101.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huai Sheng Chen, Jun Min Wen, Sheng Nan Wu, Jian Ping Liu

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments. Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation. Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF, and the need to continue sinus rhythm, ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative. Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been developed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 15 10%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 24 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,105,623
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,578
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,944
of 132,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.