↓ Skip to main content

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007101.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huai Sheng Chen, Jun Min Wen, Sheng Nan Wu, Jian Ping Liu

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments. Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation. Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF, and the need to continue sinus rhythm, ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative. Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,110
of 174,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.