You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Editorial: Autophagy: From Big Data to Physiological Significance
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2020
Sovan Sarkar, Maria I. Vaccaro, Ioannis P. Nezis
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||12%|
|Student > Master||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||18%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||12%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||6%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
of 9,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 456,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.