↓ Skip to main content

Clinical pharmacokinetics of 3-h extended infusion of meropenem in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: implications for empirical therapy against Gram-negative bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical pharmacokinetics of 3-h extended infusion of meropenem in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: implications for empirical therapy against Gram-negative bacteria
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0622-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amol T. Kothekar, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Anand Patil, Manjunath Nookala Krishnamurthy, Harish Mallapura Maheshwarappa, Suhail Sarwar Siddiqui, Murari Gurjar, Sanjay Biswas, Vikram Gota

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,604,817
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#655
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,012
of 456,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.