You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Refusals to perform ritual circumcision: a qualitative study of doctors’ professional and ethical reasoning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-0444-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liv Astrid Litleskare, Mette Tolås Strander, Reidun Førde, Morten Magelssen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,985,528
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#177
of 1,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,855
of 478,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.