↓ Skip to main content

Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004262.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica L Baer, Mark W Davies, Kirsty Easterbrook

Abstract

Napkin dermatitis is a common condition that occurs in otherwise healthy infants. It causes discomfort to infants, anxiety to parents and caregivers and contributes to the load on the health care system. A large variety of napkins, both disposable and non-disposable, are available. Evidence is required to assist carers and health care workers in making informed decisions when balancing the pros and cons of different napkin choices.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 6 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,313,630
of 14,473,834 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,900
of 10,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,125
of 123,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,473,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.