↓ Skip to main content

CHANGE IN THE RATE OF POST-TRANSFUSION-TRANSMITTED INFECTION TEST ADMINISTRATION FOLLOWING BY INTRODUCTION OF AN ALERT SYSTEM IN AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CHANGE IN THE RATE OF POST-TRANSFUSION-TRANSMITTED INFECTION TEST ADMINISTRATION FOLLOWING BY INTRODUCTION OF AN ALERT SYSTEM IN AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD
Published in
Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, January 2012
DOI 10.3925/jjtc.58.547
Authors

Ikuyo Hayakawa, Osamu Tokuno, Makoto Hashimoto, Yusuke Nakaya, Yoshito Yabumoto, Yutaka Takaoka, Eiichi Maeda, Seiji Kawano, Katsuyasu Saigo, Daisuke Sugiyama, Takeshi Sugimoto, Hironobu Minami

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#19,820,130
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,310
of 252,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them