You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multimodal genomic features predict outcome of immune checkpoint blockade in non-small-cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Cancer, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s43018-019-0008-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valsamo Anagnostou, Noushin Niknafs, Kristen Marrone, Daniel C. Bruhm, James R. White, Jarushka Naidoo, Karlijn Hummelink, Kim Monkhorst, Ferry Lalezari, Mara Lanis, Samuel Rosner, Joshua E. Reuss, Kellie N. Smith, Vilmos Adleff, Kristen Rodgers, Zineb Belcaid, Lamia Rhymee, Benjamin Levy, Josephine Feliciano, Christine L. Hann, David S. Ettinger, Christos Georgiades, Franco Verde, Peter Illei, Qing Kay Li, Alexander S. Baras, Edward Gabrielson, Malcolm V. Brock, Rachel Karchin, Drew M. Pardoll, Stephen B. Baylin, Julie R. Brahmer, Robert B. Scharpf, Patrick M. Forde, Victor E. Velculescu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 6% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 97 | 45% |
| Scientists | 89 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 88 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#241,815
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cancer
#56
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,038
of 482,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cancer
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.