↓ Skip to main content

Applying circuit theory and landscape linkage maps to reintroduction planning for California Condors

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying circuit theory and landscape linkage maps to reintroduction planning for California Condors
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0226491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse D’Elia, Joseph Brandt, L. Joseph Burnett, Susan M. Haig, Jeff Hollenbeck, Steve Kirkland, Bruce G. Marcot, Arianna Punzalan, Christopher J. West, Tiana Williams-Claussen, Rachel Wolstenholme, Rich Young

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#10,623,162
of 16,600,302 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#99,272
of 161,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,280
of 384,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#131
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,600,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.