You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of the Recommended Summary Plan for eEmergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire A. Hawkes, Zoe Fritz, Gavin Deas, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Alison Richardson, David Pitcher, Juliet Spiller, Gavin D. Perkins, On behalf of the ReSPECT working group collaborators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,591,567
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#512
of 5,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,828
of 473,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#14
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.