↓ Skip to main content

Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mercury and selenium concentrations in fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin, southwestern United States: A retrospective assessment
Published in
PLoS ONE, January 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0226824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie K. Day, Travis S. Schmidt, James J. Roberts, Barbara C. Osmundson, James J. Willacker, Collin A. Eagles-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Environmental Science 3 25%
Unspecified 2 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,640,656
of 16,519,937 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#23,189
of 160,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,998
of 382,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#47
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,519,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.