You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A qualitative study of clinician attitudes towards closed‐loop systems in mainstream diabetes care in England
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetic Medicine, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/dme.14235 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Farrington, H. R. Murphy, R. Hovorka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,756,393
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Diabetic Medicine
#1,648
of 3,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,514
of 451,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetic Medicine
#51
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.