↓ Skip to main content

Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory

Overview of attention for article published in Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK), January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and usability testing of a very brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change in primary care using normalisation process theory
Published in
Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK), January 2020
DOI 10.1017/s146342361900080x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Mills, Simon J. Griffin, Stephen Sutton, Juliet A. Usher-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Psychology 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,430,485
of 16,046,842 outputs
Outputs from Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK)
#196
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,262
of 305,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primary Health Care Research & Development (Cambridge University Press / UK)
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,046,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.