The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Propofol versus midazolam with or without short-acting opioids for sedation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety, satisfaction, and efficiency outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fahima Dossa, Braeden Medeiros, Christine Keng, Sergio A Acuna, Nancy N Baxter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,840,345
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#350
of 5,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,407
of 484,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#20
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.