↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of a Japanese translation of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM-J)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 442)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of a Japanese translation of the Stress Mindset Measure (SMM-J)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2020
DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.90.18229
Authors

Keigo Iwamoto (Okubo), Hiroki Takehashi, Fumiaki Taka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#676,018
of 14,569,513 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#11
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,147
of 253,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,569,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.