You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ancient West African foragers in the context of African population history
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-1929-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Lipson, Isabelle Ribot, Swapan Mallick, Nadin Rohland, Iñigo Olalde, Nicole Adamski, Nasreen Broomandkhoshbacht, Ann Marie Lawson, Saioa López, Jonas Oppenheimer, Kristin Stewardson, Raymond Neba’ane Asombang, Hervé Bocherens, Neil Bradman, Brendan J. Culleton, Els Cornelissen, Isabelle Crevecoeur, Pierre de Maret, Forka Leypey Mathew Fomine, Philippe Lavachery, Christophe Mbida Mindzie, Rosine Orban, Elizabeth Sawchuk, Patrick Semal, Mark G. Thomas, Wim Van Neer, Krishna R. Veeramah, Douglas J. Kennett, Nick Patterson, Garrett Hellenthal, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Scott MacEachern, Mary E. Prendergast, David Reich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 315 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 6% |
| Spain | 13 | 4% |
| Japan | 10 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 157 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 230 | 73% |
| Scientists | 69 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 21% |
| Researcher | 43 | 18% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 75 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 781. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,051
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,383
of 98,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#656
of 479,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#55
of 864 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 864 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.