↓ Skip to main content

Red China’s Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development under the Commune, by Joshua Eisenman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018. viii+436 pp. US…

Overview of attention for article published in The China Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 141)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red China’s Green Revolution: Technological Innovation, Institutional Change, and Economic Development under the Commune, by Joshua Eisenman. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018. viii+436 pp. US$35.00/£27.00 (paper).
Published in
The China Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1086/706701
Authors

Jørgen Delman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,810,259
of 15,794,319 outputs
Outputs from The China Journal
#46
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,389
of 298,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The China Journal
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,794,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.