↓ Skip to main content

Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia , edited by Evelyn Goh. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. viii+291 pp. £55.00 (cloth).

Overview of attention for article published in The China Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia , edited by Evelyn Goh. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. viii+291 pp. £55.00 (cloth).
Published in
The China Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1086/706698
Authors

Joshua Eisenman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,313,598
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from The China Journal
#197
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,250
of 457,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The China Journal
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.