↓ Skip to main content

Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia, edited by Evelyn Goh. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. viii+291 pp. £55.00 (cloth).

Overview of attention for article published in The China Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia, edited by Evelyn Goh. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. viii+291 pp. £55.00 (cloth).
Published in
The China Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1086/706698
Authors

Joshua Eisenman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,286,254
of 15,508,924 outputs
Outputs from The China Journal
#100
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,589
of 287,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The China Journal
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,508,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.