You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A framework for the ethical assessment of chimeric animal research involving human neural tissue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0345-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Rosa Sun, Göran Hermerén |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,003,753
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#330
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,756
of 437,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.