You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lentiviral gene therapy for X-linked chronic granulomatous disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-019-0735-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald B. Kohn, Claire Booth, Elizabeth M. Kang, Sung-Yun Pai, Kit L. Shaw, Giorgia Santilli, Myriam Armant, Karen F. Buckland, Uimook Choi, Suk See De Ravin, Morna J. Dorsey, Caroline Y. Kuo, Diego Leon-Rico, Christine Rivat, Natalia Izotova, Kimberly Gilmour, Katie Snell, Jinhua Xu-Bayford Dip, Jinan Darwish, Emma C. Morris, Dayna Terrazas, Leo D. Wang, Christopher A. Bauser, Tobias Paprotka, Douglas B. Kuhns, John Gregg, Hayley E. Raymond, John K. Everett, Geraldine Honnet, Luca Biasco, Peter E. Newburger, Frederic D. Bushman, Manuel Grez, H. Bobby Gaspar, David A. Williams, Harry L. Malech, Anne Galy, Adrian J. Thrasher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Israel | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#167,631
of 25,081,285 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#704
of 9,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,060
of 464,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#19
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.