↓ Skip to main content

Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1955 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
Published in
Nature Geoscience, November 2009
DOI 10.1038/ngeo689
Authors

Corinne Le Quéré, Michael R. Raupach, Josep G. Canadell, Gregg Marland, Laurent Bopp, Philippe Ciais, Thomas J. Conway, Scott C. Doney, Richard A. Feely, Pru Foster, Pierre Friedlingstein, Kevin Gurney, Richard A. Houghton, Joanna I. House, Chris Huntingford, Peter E. Levy, Mark R. Lomas, Joseph Majkut, Nicolas Metzl, Jean P. Ometto, Glen P. Peters, I. Colin Prentice, James T. Randerson, Steven W. Running, Jorge L. Sarmiento, Ute Schuster, Stephen Sitch, Taro Takahashi, Nicolas Viovy, Guido R. van der Werf, F. Ian Woodward

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,955 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 51 3%
United Kingdom 35 2%
Germany 18 <1%
France 15 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Netherlands 8 <1%
India 6 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Other 45 2%
Unknown 1754 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 495 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 480 25%
Student > Master 288 15%
Student > Bachelor 162 8%
Professor 93 5%
Other 437 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 588 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 566 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 364 19%
Unspecified 166 8%
Engineering 70 4%
Other 201 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#106,319
of 13,735,246 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#344
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#594
of 122,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#2
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,735,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.