↓ Skip to main content

Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1639 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2704 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
Published in
Nature Geoscience, November 2009
DOI 10.1038/ngeo689
Authors

Corinne Le Quéré, Michael R. Raupach, Josep G. Canadell, Gregg Marland, Laurent Bopp, Philippe Ciais, Thomas J. Conway, Scott C. Doney, Richard A. Feely, Pru Foster, Pierre Friedlingstein, Kevin Gurney, Richard A. Houghton, Joanna I. House, Chris Huntingford, Peter E. Levy, Mark R. Lomas, Joseph Majkut, Nicolas Metzl, Jean P. Ometto, Glen P. Peters, I. Colin Prentice, James T. Randerson, Steven W. Running, Jorge L. Sarmiento, Ute Schuster, Stephen Sitch, Taro Takahashi, Nicolas Viovy, Guido R. van der Werf, F. Ian Woodward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,704 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 45 2%
United Kingdom 36 1%
Germany 18 <1%
France 15 <1%
Brazil 11 <1%
Netherlands 8 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
India 6 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
Other 44 2%
Unknown 2508 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 613 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 552 20%
Student > Master 378 14%
Student > Bachelor 246 9%
Professor 117 4%
Other 437 16%
Unknown 361 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 724 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 649 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 434 16%
Engineering 94 3%
Chemistry 52 2%
Other 265 10%
Unknown 486 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#212,516
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#464
of 3,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#626
of 182,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.