↓ Skip to main content

Access to medicines for diabetes treatment in Brazil: evaluation of “health has no price” program

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Access to medicines for diabetes treatment in Brazil: evaluation of “health has no price” program
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13098-016-0150-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Leopoldo Oliveira Araujo, João Leopoldo Oliveira Araujo, Mariana Donato Pereira, Cristiane Bergamaschi, Fernando Sá Del Fiol, Luciane Cruz Lopes, Maria Inês Toledo, Silvio Barberato-Filho

Abstract

In 2011, private pharmacies associated to the Brazilian Ministry of Health provided patients with two types of insulin (regular human insulin and isophane insulin or NPH) and three oral antidiabetic medications (5 mg glibenclamide and 500 and 850 mg metformin) free of charge. The aim was to evaluate the impact of the "Health Has No Price" Program [Saúde Não Tem Preço (SNTP)] for access to diabetes treatment medicines in Brazil. This longitudinal and observational study is based on the number of units of oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin and insulin analogues supplied in 55,000 private pharmacies from February 1, 2010 to January 31, 2012. The number of tablets (oral hypoglycemic agents) and international units (insulins and insulin analogues) supplied in the first 12 months of the SNTP Program were compared with the number of tablets and international units supplied in the 12 months prior to its implementation. The insulins in the SNTP program had the highest percentage change in the number of international units supplied; regular human insulin increased by 97.8 % and isophane insulin (NPH) by 78.0 %. Among the oral hypoglycemic agents, 5 mg glibenclamide increased by 65.9 %, and 500 and 850 mg metformin increased by 46.8 and 39.9 %, respectively, in the number of tablets dispensed in the first year of the SNTP Program. Among the hypoglycemic agents not available in SNTP, 4 mg glimepiride had the highest percentage increase in units supplied (19.2 %) in the same period. Among the insulin analogues, which were not available in the SNTP Program, insulin glulisine showed the greatest increase in units dispensed (34.2 %). The SNTP Program contributed to increased access to medicines for the treatment of diabetes in Brazil.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 38%
Unspecified 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 10%
Other 5 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,986,080
of 7,695,064 outputs
Outputs from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#139
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,394
of 269,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,695,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.