You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using health facility-based serological surveillance to predict receptive areas at risk of malaria outbreaks in elimination areas
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1482-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henry Surendra, Supargiyono, Riris A. Ahmad, Rizqiani A. Kusumasari, Theodola B. Rahayujati, Siska Y. Damayanti, Kevin K. A. Tetteh, Chetan Chitnis, Gillian Stresman, Jackie Cook, Chris Drakeley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,710,202
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,751
of 3,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,699
of 465,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#30
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.