You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000964.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill Ferrari, Julian PT Higgins, Trevor D Prior |
| Abstract |
Hallux valgus is classified as an abnormal deviation of the great toe (hallux) towards the midline of the foot. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,395,177
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,923
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,886
of 107,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.