↓ Skip to main content

Framing war: visual propaganda, the Islamic State, and the battle for east Mosul

Overview of attention for article published in Cambridge Review of International Affairs, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 366)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 tweeters
Title
Framing war: visual propaganda, the Islamic State, and the battle for east Mosul
Published in
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, January 2020
DOI 10.1080/09557571.2019.1706074
Authors

Charlie Winter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#370,951
of 15,353,339 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#7
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,352
of 281,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,353,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.