↓ Skip to main content

Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
649 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
Published in
The Lancet, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30068-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Brisson, Jane J Kim, Karen Canfell, Mélanie Drolet, Guillaume Gingras, Emily A Burger, Dave Martin, Kate T Simms, Élodie Bénard, Marie-Claude Boily, Stephen Sy, Catherine Regan, Adam Keane, Michael Caruana, Diep T N Nguyen, Megan A Smith, Jean-François Laprise, Mark Jit, Michel Alary, Freddie Bray, Elena Fidarova, Fayad Elsheikh, Paul J N Bloem, Nathalie Broutet, Raymond Hutubessy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 649 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 345 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 21%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Other 28 8%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 80 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 97 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 648. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#19,008
of 18,478,499 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#527
of 37,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#644
of 346,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#41
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,478,499 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.