You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-0452-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marlies Saelaert, Heidi Mertes, Tania Moerenhout, Elfride De Baere, Ignaas Devisch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,981,168
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#731
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,449
of 451,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.