You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electro-Haptic Enhancement of Spatial Hearing in Cochlear Implant Users
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-58503-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark D. Fletcher, Robyn O. Cunningham, Sean R. Mills |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 5 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#700,926
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,711
of 126,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,471
of 452,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#246
of 4,194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.