↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for ingrowing toenails

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001541.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Just AH Eekhof, Bart Van Wijk, Arie Knuistingh Neven, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 285 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Postgraduate 29 10%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 20 7%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 85 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 93 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,403,162
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,774
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,686
of 176,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.