↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for ingrowing toenails

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001541.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Just AH Eekhof, Bart Van Wijk, Arie Knuistingh Neven, Johannes C van der Wouden

Abstract

Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 14 11%
Other 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 57%
Unspecified 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,288,730
of 13,272,830 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,792
of 10,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,475
of 121,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,272,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.