The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001541.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Just AH Eekhof, Bart Van Wijk, Arie Knuistingh Neven, Johannes C van der Wouden |
Abstract |
Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 42% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 10% |
Researcher | 22 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Other | 50 | 17% |
Unknown | 85 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Unknown | 93 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,403,162
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,774
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,686
of 176,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.